首页> 外文OA文献 >Significant changes in the practice of chest radiography in Dutch intensive care units: a web-based survey
【2h】

Significant changes in the practice of chest radiography in Dutch intensive care units: a web-based survey

机译:荷兰重症监护病房的胸部放射学实践发生重大变化:基于网络的调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

ICU patients frequently undergo chest radiographs (CXRs). The diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy of routine CXRs are now known to be low, but the discussion regarding specific indications for CXRs in critically ill patients and the safety of abandoning routine CXRs is still ongoing. We performed a survey of Dutch intensivists on the current practice of chest radiography in their departments. Web-based questionnaires, containing questions regarding ICU characteristics, ICU patients, daily CXR strategies, indications for routine CXRs and the practice of radiologic evaluation, were sent to the medical directors of all adult ICUs in the Netherlands. CXR strategies were compared between all academic and non-academic hospitals and between ICUs of different sizes. A comparison was made between the survey results obtained in 2006 and 2013. Of the 83 ICUs that were contacted, 69 (83%) responded to the survey. Only 7% of responding ICUs were currently performing daily routine CXRs for all patients, and 61% of the responding ICUs were said never to perform CXRs on a routine basis. A daily meeting with a radiologist is an established practice in 72% of the responding ICUs and is judged to be important or even essential by those ICUs. The therapeutic efficacy of routine CXRs was assumed by intensivists to be lower than 10% or to be between 10 and 20%. The efficacy of 'on-demand' CXRs was assumed to be between 10 and 60%. There is a consensus between intensivists to perform a routine CXR after endotracheal intubation, chest tube placement or central venous catheterization. The strategy of daily routine CXRs for critically ill and mechanically ventilated patients has turned from being a common practice in 2006 to a rare current practice. Other routine strategies and an 'on-demand only' strategy have become more popular. Intensivists still assume the value of CXRs to be higher than the efficacy that is reported in the literature
机译:ICU患者经常接受胸部X光片(CXR)。现在已知常规CXR的诊断和治疗效果还很低,但是有关危重患者CXR的特殊适应症和放弃常规CXR的安全性的讨论仍在进行中。我们对荷兰的专科医师进行了一项有关他们所在部门目前胸部X光检查实践的调查。基于网络的调查表已发送给荷兰所有成人ICU的医疗主管,其中包含有关ICU特征,ICU患者,每日CXR策略,常规CXR指征以及放射学评估实践的问题。比较了所有学术医院和非学术医院之间以及不同规模的ICU之间的CXR策略。在2006年和2013年获得的调查结果之间进行了比较。在所联系的83个ICU中,有69个(83%)回答了该调查。目前,只有7%的ICU应答对所有患者执行日常CXR,并且据说61%的ICU从未进行过常规CXR。在72%的回应ICU中,每天与放射科医生会面是一种惯例,被那些ICU认为是重要甚至必不可少的。强化医生认为常规CXR的治疗功效低于10%或10至20%。 “按需” CXR的功效假定为10%至60%。在气管插管,胸管放置或中心静脉导管插入后,强化医师之间应进行常规CXR,这是共识。重症患者和机械通气患者的日常CXR策略已从2006年的普遍做法转变为目前罕见的做法。其他常规策略和“仅按需”策略已变得越来越流行。强化治疗师仍认为CXR的价值高于文献报道的疗效

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号